HOW CLOSE IS CLOSE?    By Rabbi Baruch Cohon – Nitzavim – Deut. 29:9–30    

HOW CLOSE IS CLOSE?    By Rabbi Baruch Cohon – Nitzavim – Deut. 29:9–30

The people are camped on the east bank of the Jordan, listening to a final message from Moshe Rabbeinu —.  Moses our Rav.  He knows he will not cross that river with them, and he wants them to know what to do when they enter the Promised Land.  The name of this reading is “Nitzavim” – literally “Standing.”  Not just “standing around,” however.  That would be om’dim. The very word Nitzavim indicates they were standing at attention.  The opening lines of Moses’ discourse set the scene:

“You are standing today, all of you, before your G-d.  Your leaders, your tribes, your elders and your officers – all the men of Israel.  Your children, your women, the strangers in your midst, your woodcutters and your water-carriers.  [You are here] to form a covenant with G-d… all those who are here with us today, and those who are not here with us today.”

Not here?  Did anyone not make that list?  That was a pretty complete list.  Who was not there?  All the unborn generations.  Including us. The covenant is a sacred commitment that involves us all.

And what was the covenant?  Of course we know the Hebrew word for a covenant is “bris.”  That’s right.  Bris does not mean circumcision, it means covenant.  First came the covenant of Abraham which certainly includes circumcision.  That is still observed, even though lately some officials in some places consider it politically incorrect.  But the covenant of Moses goes far beyond a physical operation.  It extends to the responsibility for “mitzvot,” the commandments, the daily conduct that shapes our lives.  It’s what we do that makes us what we are.  Moses taught us standards for our conduct – like honest dealings, respect for the sacred, educating our children in Torah. Carrying out those standards of conduct can make us more than what we are; they can make us what we should be.

Earlier in his speeches, Moses went into quite a bit of detail about those standards.  Here he refers to the rewards we can expect if we live by Torah teachings, and the penalties that go with their violation – 98 of them that we read last week. Then he anticipates the inevitable question, which does not appear in the Torah but resounds in each of our minds, the question we just have to ask: Isn’t this job too hard?  Do you really expect me to do all this?

In Chapter 30 that we read this morning, Moses gives his answer: Hamitzva hazot lo nifleyt hee mim’kha v’lo r’khoka hee,which we can paraphrase this way:  This commandment is not beyond your ability, nor is it far away.  It is not in heaven, so you don’t need to say “who will go up in a space ship and get it for us and bring it down and tell it to us so we may do it?”  And it is not overseas, so don’t look for someone to cross the ocean and bring it back to you.  No, this matter is very close to you, in your mouth and in your heart, to do it.  Kee karov elekha hadavar m’od, b’feekha uvil’vav’kha laasoto. 

Karov m’od – very close.  Very close, eh?  How close is close?

By attending this service and hearing the message of Nitzavim, you already come closer to fulfilling the commandment.

How about those services you missed last year?  Those Shabat and festival occasions when you chose to be somewhere else?  Did the covenant desert you because you were somewhere else?  What commandment did you fulfill somewhere else?  Did you help someone who needed help because their car stalled?  Did you remind your kids to get advance homework because they will be absent from school on Rosh Hashana?  Did you write a letter to the editor of a newspaper that printed a slanderous anti-Israel column?

By the way, if I can change the subject for a minute, we can all hold our own honest opinions pro or con about Israeli government policies, but some 7 million Jews in Israel are our people, and what affects them is bound to affect us.  We are, and we remain, “am segulah,” a chosen people. Divinely chosen for a certain lifestyle, and chosen all too often by human enemies as a victim.  Once in a while, like Tevye we might wish that the Almighty would choose someone else, but don’t hold your breath.  And besides, those 7 million are also Nitzavim today.  They stand with us.  One people.

Now back to the contract.  Reform congregations will read “Nitzavim” again on Yom Kippur morning, as we come face to face with our spiritual day of reckoning.  For traditional Jews, this very Shabat sanctifies a week of prayers for forgiveness.  We said our midnight prayers at Slichot, we glory in the sound of the Shofar on Rosh Hashana.  And ten days later, we will stand at attention, all of us.  More Jews in one place at one time than on any other day in the year.  Our leaders and our followers, wives and husbands and children, woodcutters and water department meter readers.  We stand together – Nitzavim – and we try to honor the covenant.

This is the time, this is the season when we can remind ourselves that our commitment to our Torah, to our faith, to our people, is not beyond our reach.  It is not in heaven, but here on earth.  It is not exclusively overseas, because our forebears brought it to America.  It is indeed close to us.

How close?  As close as the mezuzah on your doorpost.  As close as the candle on your table.  As close as the book on your shelf.  As close as your pride in your heritage.

The covenant is as close to us today as the medal a decorated veteran wears. By wearing it, we evidence our pride. It is as close as the cup we lift to celebrate the Sabbath — and by drinking that wine we bring the sweet taste of heritage into our lives.  Truly it is in your mouth and in your heart.  It is as close as the tree limbs we will lift on top of our Succah, recalling our ancestors’ joy in the harvest.  It is as close as the hour we will spend helping a child do some homework.  It is as close as the jumper cables we will use to help our neighbor start that stalled car.

Every service we attend, every ritual we observe, brings it closer.

All of these actions are part of our covenant.  They are as close to us as we will get to them.  The closer we bring our covenant to our lives, the better prepared we can be to face a new year.

Have a great one!

Posted in Jewish Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on HOW CLOSE IS CLOSE?    By Rabbi Baruch Cohon – Nitzavim – Deut. 29:9–30    

A BASKET OF THANKS — “Kee Tavo” Deut. 26-29:8, by Rabbi Baruch Cohon

A BASKET OF THANKS — “Kee Tavo” Deut. 26-29:8, by Rabbi Baruch Cohon
_
This week Moses concludes his second “parting discourse” and begins
the third.  His message once again highlights choices, to be
dramatically presented to the people once they enter the Promised
Land.  Six tribes will hail the positive choices on one mountainside,
and the other six will warn about the negatives on the facing
mountainside.  The great leader reminds us of our Divine Covenant.  He
recalls our ancestors’ suffering in Egypt, and accepting the Law with
all its brilliant blessings and its threatened curses.  And he
concludes by recounting the spectacular victory over enemy tyrants
like Sikhon the Amorite king and Og, king of Bashan.
_
Before launching into his oratory, however, Moses delivers a simple
commandment about First Fruits.  In the very second sentence of this
week’s reading he says:  “Take some of the first [to ripen] from every
fruit of the ground, that you gather from the land that G-d is giving
you, and put them in a basket.  Then go to the place that G-d will
choose for His name to dwell there, and go to the “cohen” (the
priest) who will be there in those days and tell him: “I declare
before G-d today that I came into the land that He swore to our
fathers to give us.”  One Talmudic rabbi with a sense of humor asks
about the “cohen who will be there: Could I take it to the cohen who
will NOT be there?”  Then he interprets: Never mind whether the
“cohen” is great or ordinary, whether he is your friend or not.  Just
deal with the resident priest.
_
Back to Moses’ teaching:  “And the priest will take the basket from
your hand and place it before the altar.”  Not all the crops qualify
to enter the basket, says Rashi, quoting the Talmud.  Just the seven
fruits typical of the Land of Israel: wheat, barley, vines, figs,
pomegranates, olives and date-honey.  These crops represent the land.
Bringing them to the altar expresses the Jew’s thanks for that land.
_
Let’s nitpick a little more.  Why must the First Fruits be placed in a
basket?  Really, why “dafka” a basket?  Other mitzvot about offerings
have no such specifications.  Couldn’t the farmer just tie them in a
bundle?  Shlep them in a sack?  What is so special about this basket
that Moses includes it in the commandment?
_
It remained for the Lubavitcher Rebbe to deal with this question.  In
his Likutei Sichos he quotes the Midrash that teaches the mystical
idea of creation, namely that the Divine intention to create Jewish
souls “preceded everything.”  So Jewish souls are comparable to First
Fruits.  From this mystic text, we learn that before birth the soul is
in Heaven enjoying a pure and ecstatic relationship with the Creator.
Nevertheless that soul is sent to Earth to inhabit a body which
conceals its Divine relationship.  But through the very concealment, a
human soul can carry out a mission in the  physical world which is
exactly G-d’s purpose in sending it here.  In essence, then, just as
the offering of First Fruits needs a basket to attain its place at the
altar, so the human soul needs a body to accomplish its purpose on
Earth.
_
Following this idea through, we can conclude that just as the priest
“takes the basket from your hand,” so the L-rd takes the body when the
time comes.  Let us hope that the soul within that body earned its
place on the holy altar.
Posted in Jewish Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A BASKET OF THANKS — “Kee Tavo” Deut. 26-29:8, by Rabbi Baruch Cohon

AMMON, MOAB and US – Kee seytzey – Deut. 21:10 – 25 by Rabbi Baruch Cohon

AMMON, MOAB and US – Kee seytzey – Deut. 21:10 – 25 by Rabbi Baruch Cohon

Among the 70-odd Mitzvos detailed in this week’s Torah reading, we find one that echoes strangely against today’s discussions of intergroup relations.

Deep in this section’s third Aliyah, Chapter 23 has Moses cautioning the people: “No Ammonite or Moabite shall enter the assembly of G-d, even to the tenth generation.” Why? “Because they did not meet you with bread and water when you came out of Egypt.” No refugee status. No public handouts. In fact, they “hired Bilaam ben Beor…to bring a curse upon you.”

True, Ammon and Moab did not build any walls to keep Israel out, but they did not welcome us either. We didn’t speak their language. Maybe our eyes were a different shape? Or our skin a different shade?

By the standards of that day, Ammon and Moab had well established monarchies, and represented prosperous nations. They did not need an influx of ex-slaves, speaking a foreign language (Hebrew, that is, not Spanish).

Presumably they didn’t want immigrant kids in their schools earning all the highest grades, even if they didn’t calculate in Chinese.

Could we in our time possibly be duplicating the ancient offense of Ammon and Moab?

Or were they just typical of their time, treating any other nation as an enemy?

But wait. In our Torah reading, a contrasting rule follows immediately: “Do not despise an Edomite; he is your brother.” Edom opposed Israel, but the ancestor of their nation was Esau, Jacob’s brother. Likewise, “Do not despise an Egyptian; you were a stranger in his land.” As the rabbis explain, enslaving the Israelites was the work of the tyrannous Pharaohs, not of the people. In fact many Egyptian commoners followed their Israelite neighbors in the Exodus.

So for our ancestors, relations between national populations grew complicated. Moses attempted to put some ideals to work in forming those relations. It was difficult for him, and that difficulty extended into the following centuries.

In the case of Ammon and Moab, for example, the ban applied to men, but a woman could become a giyores – a convert – and be totally accepted. The prime example of that process was the young lady who gave her name to a particularly beloved book of the Bible, namely Ruth. Moabite though she was, she married Boaz and became the ancestress of no less than King David.

Maybe we in the United States are not consistent in our attitude toward the “stranger,” the refugee, the unfortunates who seek a better life. We don’t always meet them with “bread and water.”

Still, our country has a better record on immigration than many other nations. Certainly a large majority of us became American Jews by moving here from oppressive foreign shores. Many of us, or our parents or grandparents, had to travel halfway around the world, with no money, no connections, no language to greet their new countrymen. I will never cease admiring the courage of our Immigrant Generation. Much of that kind of courage can be seen in the faces of the young people who throng U.S. borders now.

No, we are not encouraging our government to admit criminals, and definitely not terrorists. But we have some power to check an immigrant’s record. And we can still move away from the offensive stance of Ammon and Moab. Even some bread and water can help.

Posted in Jewish Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on AMMON, MOAB and US – Kee seytzey – Deut. 21:10 – 25 by Rabbi Baruch Cohon

4-F or DD? – Deut. 20 – Shoftim – by Rabbi Baruch Cohon

4-F or DD? – Deut. 20 – Shoftim – by Rabbi Baruch Cohon

One section in this week’s Sedrah highlights a significant difference between Torah law and facts of life today, including in modern Israel.  “When you go out to battle against your enemies,” it begins, you will get instructions.  First the cohen, the chaplain, addresses the troops and urges them not to be afraid because the Almighty is on their side.  “He will fight for you, to save you.”  Then come the officers.  They speak to the men they command, and offer certain exemptions, a total of four.

Number 1: A man who built a house that’s not yet dedicated, let him go home and dedicate his house, lest someone else take it.

2-one who planted a vineyard and still did not harvest it,

3-one who betrothed a wife and did not yet marry her, and

4-the last and most telling: one who is afraid of battle and could infect his fellow soldiers with his fear.

Clearly, Biblical Israel had a military draft, but conditions of service were different.  Today’s State of Israel also has universal military service, and it also has legal exemptions.  Different ones, to be sure.

  • Israelis who moved to another country, for one.
  • Those who have serious physical illness.
  • Those who have serious mental illness – which presumably could include fear of fighting, but is not limited to that.

.

4-Also exempted are Yeshiva students who proclaim Torah to be their umanut – their profession. This rule may change now, since more religious Israelis are choosing military service, and the armed forces are beginning to provide opportunities for them to serve and still observe tradition.

When the United States had a draft, the main exemptions were more limited. In World War II for example, an incurable physical ailment got you a draft number 4-F – as distinct from 1-A, a good specimen.  And if you did get drafted, or enlisted, and later showed psychological trouble, you got a DD – a Disability Discharge.  Fear of fighting was not the determining factor for one of those.

Comparing Biblical requirements with some modern ones, we can discover important differences in our views of national defense.  Neither here nor in modern Israel does the government care about the young man who just built a house, or just planted a field, or just got engaged to his sweetheart.  We may wonder how long and how thoroughly those exemptions were observed. Considerations of the individual get discarded by powerful rulers.  When we go to war, the nation comes first.

As dangers mount, we hear talk of renewing the draft in the United States.  If that happens, we can well expect exemption problems based on politics, gender identity, and religious practice – particularly in a multi-cultural country like ours.

Can we look back on the Torah’s deferments and maybe seek a way to a lifestyle as innocent as that described in Sedrah Shoftim?

While we may make an effort to bring Torah into our daily lives, this is one time when that may look impossible.  But what does not work today in military service can indeed affect our civilian attitudes.  Let our neighbors dedicate their new house.  Help them harvest their new vineyard.  Give them a wedding present.  Maybe we won’t keep a soldier out of action, but we could help a neighbor be a friend.

It’s not a law today.  It’s just Torah-true action.

 

 

Posted in Jewish Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 4-F or DD? – Deut. 20 – Shoftim – by Rabbi Baruch Cohon

The Benefit of the Doubt Torah

This week’s Dvar Torah is a direct quote from my son Rabbi Samuel M. Cohon, and appears on his website, RabbiSamCohon.com
I think you will find it important. 
We celebrate the new month of Elul on Sunday, August 12th, the beginning of the final month of the Jewish year.  It’s the time of year to think about the state of our relationships, to prepare to do a cheshbon hanefesh, an accounting of the state of our souls, to reflect on where we are in our lives, where we’ve been and where we are headed.

The opening lines of this week’s parsha, Re’ei, are famously about choice.  In that passage Moses says to us, the people,

“Re’ei, anochi noten lifneichem hayom bracha u’klalla.
Et habracha asher tishm’u el-mitzvot Adonai Eloheichem asher anochi m’tzaveh etchem hayom.
V’haklallah im-lo tishm’u el-mitzvot Adonai Eloheichem…
 

“See, I give you today a blessing and a curse.
The blessing, if you listen to the mitzvot of your God that I command you today.
And the curse if you don’t obey or listen.”

On the surface, this seems like a simple restatement of the central message repeated all through Devarim: if you do good you will be blessed, if you do evil you will be cursed.  This Deuteronomic covenant lies at the heart of the Torah’s understanding of ethics.

But commentator Nechama Leibowitz points out that these are not really two parallel “if’s” here, “blessing IF you listen, curse IF you do not,” though most translations hide that.  The Torah uses two different words: it reads “et habracha ASHER tishm’u“, “v’haklalla IM-lo tishm’u“.  That is, the blessing, because you listen, and the curse, if you do not.

Rashi comments that, “the curse is written in the conditional, and the blessing in the declarative.”  That is, the blessing of God is definite while the curse is only a possibility.

Leibowitz adds that God actually gives us a line of credit, a “mitzvah equity loan” if you will, and we can borrow blessings on the speculation that we will likely do mitzvot.  It’s a good deal for us, if not necessarily for God.  This is a comforting thought: we get blessings on the likelihood that we will do mitzvot.  God rewards us and then hopes—prays?—that we act well and do good.

As we approach the season of Teshuvah, the time of return, our portion of Re’ei gives us added hope that God will always give us the benefit of the doubt, and is even extending us credit in advance to help us with our return to being our best selves.  What a wonderful gift this is.  All we need to do is to take advantage of the opportunity.

May it be our choice to embrace holiness and goodness in the coming month of Elul and in the days of return that follow.

Posted in Jewish Blogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Benefit of the Doubt Torah