You are currently browsing the Baruch Cohon Blog weblog archives for June, 2011.
June 22, 2011 by Baruch.
ויקח קרח
The first words of this week’s Torah portion pose a
question that echoes down the centuries. Korach rises up to challenge the leadership of Moses and the High Priesthood of Aaron, becoming a prototype for self-interested rebels. Some 250 prominent Israelites join him in his revolt. And how does the Torah introduce him? Does it say “Korach spoke….or rose up….or planted a new flag?” No, it says “Korach took” and then proceeds to detail his lineage and the names of the tribal princes who joined him.
And what did he take? It never says.
Obviously this wording challenged others besides Moses, namely many of our Biblical commentators. Ibn Ezra, for example, undertakes to supply what he takes to be a missing word: men. Korach took men; he did not do this alone. Rashi interprets the statement to mean he took status upon himself. As a son of Yitzhar, son of Kehat, son of Levi, Korach felt just as much entitled to authority as his first cousins Moses and Aaron who were sons of Amram, Yitzhar’s brother.
Similarly, the Kli Yokor commentary holds that Korach “took” sides with the Reubenites, who were still angry that their tribe lost its seniority and therefore its leadership role. So Korah’s chief lieutenants were Datan and Abiram, princes of the tribe of Reuben.
The Or haHaim approaches the situation differently. Korach “took” himself away. Separated himself from the camp. Set himself apart as a sign of superiority.
One meaning is very clear. Korach took the Jewish people for a highly dramatic ride in his own time. And he was certainly not the last rebel to fire controversy in Jewish life.
Korach’s rebellion ends with him and his followers dropping into a sudden sinkhole with their houses and families. As if the “earth opened its mouth and swallowed them!” And all the people flee the place, hearing their cries as they fall into the pit.
Couldn’t happen? Or could it? This year’s natural disasters in many parts of the world open a question about the fate of Korach & Co. And our modern examples are not prompted by any human rebellion. As far as we know.
How does Korach’s arrogant challenge and shocking defeat impact Jewish history? Perhaps the most picturesque comment on the whole story comes in another story, told by one Rabbah bar Bar Khana, a rabbi in the Talmud known for his tall tales. He says:
I was travelling in the desert, and an Arab took me to a spot where there was a crack in the ground. I bent down and put my ear to the crack. And I heard the voices of Korach and his followers calling out: “Moses and his Torah are true, and we are liars!”
What a way to lose an election.
Two weeks from now we will read a fascinating P.S. to the story of Korach, where the Torah states simply: “The children of Korach did not die.”
No they did not. They grew up to sing the Psalms of David in Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem. In fact some of those psalms bear their name. They transcended Korach’s mistakes. They survived his failed rebellion. They made a better choice.
The sages of Pirkey Avot compare Korach’s controversy to that of Hillel and Shammai. In Talmudic discourse, Hillel and Shammai agreed on almost nothing, yet their controversy had lasting value because it was “for the sake of Heaven” — for a high purpose. Korach’s rebellion had no future because it came from jealousy, power-greed and falsehood.
Yet, his children did not die. The pattern of Korach keeps repeating. I venture to say we all know families where one generation rebelled against Jewish life, choosing assimilation or communism or apostasy — and became lost, swallowed by the world. And then their children, or perhaps their grandchildren, rediscover their Jewish roots. They find they enjoy brightening their table with Shabat candles. They find intellectual excitement in learning Torah. They find great charm in Jewish music. They find a loving kind of fulfillment in sharing Jewish ceremonies. And they find exactly what the rebel ancestors threw away — still there, speaking to them loud and clear. As if those ancestors were calling out to them through time: “Moses and his Torah are true, and we were wrong.!”
Rebellion can be valuable. It can strengthen us. We can only hope that any controversy it produces will be an “argument in the name of Heaven.” Because then we have a chance to resolve it productively and mold a Jewish future that can still sing our songs, as the family of Korach did.
##
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
June 12, 2011 by Baruch.
As a beginning cantor, age 17, my first High Holiday job was in a small town community where the little synagogue had limited facilities. In its lobby was just one restroom, and that restroom had this sign on the door:
WOMEN
DOWNSTAIRS
FOR MEN
Local residents had some fun with that sign, because you could read it more than one way. Put a comma after “women” and it obviously means that this is the Ladies’ Room and there is also a Men’s Room downstairs. But put the comma after “downstairs” and it means that this is the Men’s Room and the women have to go downstairs. Or, with no comma at all, it would read simply “Women downstairs for men” — in which case the sign is in the wrong building.
How do we read the various signs in our lives? One monumental misreading occurs in this week’s Torah reading, which concerns the 12 spies that Moses sent to scout the land of Canaan.
The Jewish people were camped in the desert, not a year and a quarter out of Egypt. They had received the Torah at Mount Sinai, they had recovered from the sin of the Golden Calf, they had dedicated the Tabernacle — the portable shrine that was the first Jewish house of worship — and they were now close enough to plan on entering the Promised Land. No, they could not traverse the Sinai Peninsula in 100 hours like their modern mechanized descendants, but 14 months with some 3 million people on foot is not a bad record. In last week’s reading, we heard how Moses led the people in the second Passover holiday, the one-year anniversary of their freedom. Now he must prepare to enter Canaan.
Each of the spies was a prince of his tribe, a prominent honorable man. Certainly their report should be valuable. They entered the country from the south, explored the various hills and valleys, checked out the cities and the farmland. We read that this was grape ripening season — early summer — and they found such ample crops that they could bring back a grape cluster so heavy that it had to be carried on a stick by two men. With such produce, we can assume that the ancient tribes of Canaan had more advanced agricultural skills than the medieval tribes who turned much of that land into a desert.
After 40 days the spies returned to camp with that cluster, but also with a conflicted report. Ten of them admitted that this was truly a “land of milk and honey” as their parents had told them. But what really impressed them was the power of the inhabitants. Fortified cities, warlike tribes like Amalek, even giants they saw! We cannot defeat them. That’s how they read the signs.
Only two spies, Caleb and Joshua, disagreed. They saw a timorous public. “They are our bread! Their shadows left them!” Like other rich and corrupt establishments threatened with a “barbarian invasion,” the Canaanites were scared. Let’s go, said Caleb, we should go up and take the land; we can do it! If G-d gave us the strength to come this far, let’s go on.
Clearly, most of the spies were looking at walls and towers. The minority looked into the eyes of the people. Who read the signs right?
The answer to that question would have to wait another 38 years, because the people accepted the majority report, rioted against Moses and Aaron, and even considered going back to Egypt. Stuck in the desert.
After 40 days, the spies changed their generation’s history. After 40 years, Caleb finally changed his people’s destiny. The Haftorah, in Chapter 2 of the Book of Joshua, recounts the second spy story, when Joshua, now inheriting Moses’ leadership, sends just two spies. Their trip is much shorter and their report is totally different. They spend the night in Jericho in the house of a lady of the night named Rahab, who hides them under cut grain stalks on her roof to protect them from the local gendarmes, and they learn the local conditions from her. As a result, Joshua is able to lead the people across the Jordan, surround Jericho and watch its walls fall down. According to the Midrash, one of those two spies was a young fellow of 18, and the other was an octogenarian named — Caleb, the champion dissenter from the original 12 spies.
He read the signs. We should do no less. We came this far. Don’t give up!
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »